RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03816
COUNSEL: NONE
(SERVICE MEMBER)
HEARING DESIRED: NO
(APPLICANT)
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her former spouses records be corrected to reflect he made a
timely election for former spouse coverage under the Reserve
Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The court ordered her former spouse to designate her as the former
spouse SBP beneficiary.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 Sep 07, the service member was released from his reserve
assignment and transferred to the retired reserve to await retired
pay at age 60.
On 23 Sep 14, SAF/MRBR notified the applicant and the service
member that they needed to complete, sign and have notarized a
marital status affidavit (Exhibit C). In response, the applicant
provided the signed notarized marital status affidavit noting that
neither she nor the service member has remarried (Exhibit D). As
of this date, no response has been received from the service
member.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit E.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or an injustice. Under the provisions of 10 USC 1448, a
written election must be submitted within one year after
eligibility. There is no evidence the applicant or the service
members submitted an election within the required timeframe.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit E.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
She thought her former spouse had taken care of the election since
her Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) stated he was to
fill out the form and elect her as the beneficiary.
She contacted DFAS and inquired what forms needed to be completed
and was told to complete a DD Form 2293, Application for Former
Spouse Payments, not the DD Form 2656-10, Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP)/Reserve Component (RC) SBP Request for Deemed Election. She
was also told she had properly submitted all forms within the
required timeframe.
The court ordered her former spouse to complete the necessary
paperwork to elect her as the RCSBP beneficiary and she should not
be penalized due his noncompliance.
The applicants complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit
G.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, to include the
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case. While we do
not take issue with the applicants assertion that her divorce
decree ordered her former husband to designate her as the former
spouse RCSBP beneficiary, there is no evidence showing the former
service member or the applicant submitted a valid election within
one year of their divorce as required by law or that an error on
the part of the Air Force caused her or her former spouse to be
unable to submit an election in a timely manner. Even if we
assumed for the sake of argument that there was some basis to
recommend granting relief in this case, we are unable to
conclusively determine if there is a competing beneficiary for the
RCSBP benefits, and this Board has been long advised by legal
counsel that it would be inappropriate to recommend correcting the
record when doing so would serve to deprive another party of a
benefit or entitlement to which they were legally entitled.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-03816 in Executive Session on 6 May 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Sep 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Sep 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Survivor Benefit Program Marital Status
Affidavit, Applicant, dated 27 Sep 14.
Exhibit E. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 20 Oct 14, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Nov 14.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Dec 14, w/atchs
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01612
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01612 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as beneficiary for former spouse coverage under the decedents Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant was awarded full survivor benefit annuity under RCSBP by court order. However, the applicant did not notify ARPC of her RCSBP election within one year as prescribed by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04553
However, the deceased former member was married to someone other than the applicant at the time of his death. On 6 Jun 02, the deceased former member made an RCSBP election for Option C, Immediate Annuity for spouse only coverage. The applicant claimed that the deceased former member assured her several times that he had designated her as a former spouse under RCSBP, but the required action was not accomplished in compliance with law.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00201
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her former spouse informed her that he did not elect her as his survivor beneficiary when he received his 20 year letter and election form. Subsection 1448 (b)(3)(A)(iii), Manner and time of election - any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce, dissolution, or annulment. They have no record of the applicant or the military member...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01862
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of DD Form 2656-10, Final Decree of Divorce, Domestic Relations Order [Military Retirement], letters from her attorney, letters from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and numerous other documents in support of her request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 Jul 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05023
DPTT states they should have given the former service member an opportunity to correct the ARPC Form 123 he submitted at the time he made his election. Title 10 Subsection 1448 (a) (3) (A) and Section IX on the form, A married person who is eligible to provide standard annuity may not without the concurrence of the persons spouse elect not to participate in the Plan. ARPC failed to notify the service member to make corrections and updated his election in error. Exhibit F. Affidavits,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 00362
On 3 May 93, the member completed an ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, and indicated that he had no eligible spouse or children and deferred participation. The applicant and the member were divorced on 24 Aug 93. As of this date, a response has not been received by this office (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00656
On 27 May 07, the applicant and service member were married. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPPT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05388
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her deceased husband and she thought they had complied with the marriage reporting requirements of the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), when their marriage data was entered in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) upon being issued new military ID cards on 4 Feb 11, less than two months after being married on 16 Dec 10. ARPC/DPTT has no record of the deceased member or his spouse reporting the marital change within the required...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04726 2
The former service member also provided a statement requesting his former spouse be deemed his beneficiary under the SBP (Exhibit J). However, the service member, his current spouse, and the former spouse (applicant) have all provided notarized statements that are sufficient for us to conclude that there is not a competing beneficiary that would preclude this Board from recommending correction of the service members records to reflect he made a proper and timely election for former spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...